In every hospital, few decisions carry as much impact as choosing the right airway management tools. When seconds matter and visibility decides outcomes, the video laryngoscope has become the gold standard in modern intubation.

But with technology evolving, hospitals and distributors face an important question:
Should you invest in reusable, disposable, or hybrid video laryngoscope systems?

Each option offers clear advantages and trade-offs — in infection control, cost, durability, and clinical performance. This guide walks through those differences to help your team make a confident, informed choice.

Understanding the Role of a Video Laryngoscope

Before diving into comparisons, it’s worth understanding why video laryngoscopes have become essential in airway management.

Unlike traditional direct laryngoscopes, which rely on line-of-sight, a video laryngoscope uses a camera and screen to provide a magnified, illuminated view of the airway. The result:

In short, video laryngoscopes help doctors see more, act faster, and reduce complications, especially when visibility or patient anatomy makes intubation challenging.

1. Reusable Video Laryngoscopes: Built for Longevity

Reusable video laryngoscope systems are the traditional workhorses of hospital operating rooms. Made from surgical-grade stainless steel, they are designed to endure years of use when maintained and sterilized properly.

 Key Advantages

  1. Cost Efficiency Over Time
    While the initial investment may be higher, reusable laryngoscopes can be used across hundreds of procedures. Over time, the cost per use drops significantly, especially in high-volume hospitals.
  2. Premium Build Quality
    Reusable blades often feature rigid stainless steel, providing strength, weight balance, and tactile familiarity. This makes them ideal for specialists who value precision and feedback during procedures.
  3. Sustainability and Waste Reduction
    By eliminating single-use components, reusable systems help hospitals meet sustainability targets and reduce medical waste.

Key Considerations

  1. Infection Control
    The biggest challenge with reusable laryngoscopes lies in cleaning and sterilization.
    Improper reprocessing can risk cross-contamination, especially in critical care or emergency settings.
  2. Maintenance and Lifecycle Costs
    Reusable systems require regular inspection, calibration, and sterilization, which adds labor and resource costs to hospital workflows.
  3. Best Suited For
    Large hospitals and surgical centers with:

2. Disposable Video Laryngoscopes: The New Standard in Safety

Disposable video laryngoscope systems are rapidly gaining traction — and for good reason. Designed for single use, these devices eliminate the risk of cross-contamination entirely.

Key Advantages

  1. Maximum Infection Control
    Because each blade is used once and discarded, infection control is absolute. No sterilization steps, no reprocessing, no waiting between patients.
  2. Convenience and Speed
    In high-pressure environments such as ICUs, emergency departments, and field hospitals, disposables save valuable time. Medical staff can focus on patient care rather than reprocessing instruments.
  3. Consistent Performance
    Every procedure starts with a brand-new, sterile device, ensuring consistent imaging and functionality.

Key Considerations

  1. Environmental Impact
    Single-use blades generate more medical waste, which hospitals need to manage responsibly.
  2. Higher Long-Term Cost
    Over months or years, the recurring cost of disposables can exceed the one-time investment in a reusable system.
  3. Best Suited For
    Facilities where infection control and speed outweigh reuse costs, such as:

3. Hybrid Video Laryngoscopes: The Balance Between Safety and Sustainability

The hybrid video laryngoscope represents a practical middle ground between reusable and disposable systems. It features a reusable handle and camera combined with disposable blades, offering both safety and cost efficiency.

Key Advantages

  1. Balanced Infection Control
    Only the blade is single-use, while the main electronic unit remains reusable. This minimizes both contamination risks and environmental waste.
  2. Cost-Effective Over Time
    Hospitals save on device replacement costs while maintaining high hygiene standards. Hybrid systems often become the most economically sustainable solution for medium-to-large hospitals.
  3. Seamless Transition for Staff
    Since the handle and monitor remain familiar, training requirements are minimal, enabling rapid adoption.

Key Considerations

  1. Logistics and Compatibility
    Procurement teams must ensure blade and monitor compatibility across models.
  2. Cleaning Protocols for Reusable Parts
    While infection control risk is lower, reusable handles still need proper cleaning and inspection.
  3. Best Suited For
    Hospitals seeking to balance performance, cost, and infection control, such as:

Comparative Overview

Feature Reusable Disposable Hybrid
Infection Control Requires sterilization Excellent (single-use) Excellent (disposable blades)
Cost Efficiency High over time Higher recurring costs Balanced
Durability Very high Single-use High (reusable handle)
Setup Time Requires sterilization Instant Quick
Environmental Impact Minimal waste More waste Moderate
Training & Familiarity Traditional Simple Easy transition

Infection Control: The Deciding Factor

In hospitals today, infection prevention protocols shape nearly every procurement decision.

Reusable systems demand stringent sterilization workflows — which are manageable in large hospitals but challenging in smaller clinics. Disposable and hybrid systems eliminate most contamination risks but require proper disposal systems.

The right balance depends on your facility’s environment:

For a deeper look into AstraVue’s infection control approach, see AstraVue Home Page, where compliance and global certifications (FDA, CE, MDR, ISO 13485) are detailed.

Clinical Performance: Precision and Visualization

Whether reusable, disposable, or hybrid, every AstraVue video laryngoscope system is engineered for performance.

All models offer:

Reusable vs Disposable vs Hybrid Video Laryngoscope

Cost and Maintenance Insights for Procurement Teams

For procurement officers, the total cost of ownership matters more than the unit price.

Procurement teams should also consider supply chain predictability — ensuring blade availability, replacement parts, and local distributor support.

For Distributors: A Growing Market Opportunity

Globally, the adoption of video laryngoscopes continues to rise — driven by clinical evidence, safety protocols, and post-pandemic awareness.

Distributors in emerging and developed markets alike are seeing demand from:

By offering a range of reusable, disposable, and hybrid systems, distributors can serve multiple market segments and price tiers — ensuring adaptability and profitability.

Which Video Laryngoscope Is Right for Your Hospital?

Choosing between reusable, disposable, and hybrid systems isn’t just a procurement decision — it’s a commitment to your hospital’s clinical philosophy.

Whichever path you choose, AstraVue’s video laryngoscope systems deliver on one universal promise — clarity that saves time, confidence that saves lives.